Argument is not the means to Self-Knowledge or Brahma Gnana or Atma Gnana

Self-Knowledge or Brahma Gnana or Atma Gnana    is the richest and scientific wisdom.  If one is desirous to acquire Self-knowledge or Brahma Gnana or Atma Gnana than he has to be pried away from religion, yoga and theoretical philosophy.   

Self-knowledge or Brahma Gnana or Atma Gnana is currently trapped within the religious orthodoxy. Worse still, the continued identification of Gnanis with Pundits lends tacit support to the religious differences in our world.

Religion still inspires humankind, and impedes genuine inquiry. Merely being a self-described 'Gnani one does not get rid of the inborn ignorance.  The inborn ignorance is the cause of the samskara or conditioning. One can get rid of the religious or yogic conditioning or samskara but it is very difficult to get rid inborn samskara or conditioning because the whole physical existence or the universe is dependent on this inborn samskara or conditioning.

One has to drop religion and yoga and all other path and practices if one wants Self-knowledge or Brahma Gnana or Atma Gnana.    

Path of wisdom is path of verification not path of argument. There is no scope of argument in path of wisdom because the truth is non-dual.  the argument is possible only in duality.  Religion is egocentric (form) whereas path of wisdom is soul-centric (formless). Therefore both are based on different pole.  Therefore by argument the twos poles will never meet. It is foolish to venture in to argument. 

Many self-proclaimed modern guru and yogis try to force an ancient orthodox product into modern packaging through ornamental words and playing with sentimentality and feelings of people but all these packages are not Self-Knowledge or Brahma Gnana or Atma Gnana

All sort of conceptual packaging is a barrier in acquiring Self-Knowledge or Brahma Gnana or Atma Gnana.

Without realizing people believe in prefabricated concepts propagated by the orthodoxy and yogis about themselves and the world confronting them and interpreting it on the base of the waking entity which is the false self within the false experience. 

Seeker has to sweep away all the accumulated knowledge so that he sees the reality as-it-is.

Arguing about whether Buddha is right or Sankara is right will not yield the truth about the non-dualistic truth or Advaitic truth propagated by the great sages of truth.   Argument is not the means to Self-Knowledge or Brahma Gnana or Atma Gnana. Argument is the great hindrance in pursuit of truth. 

 The person who argues and trying to provoke is an intellectual.  Intellectualism is based on individuality. Individuality is false hood because self is not an individual.