A Gnani is free from experiencing the illusion (body + universe) as reality, he is fully aware of the fact that, his body and his experience of the world as consciousness, which is ultimate truth or Brahman.
People
who are incapable to inquire and reason are tending to follow some
philosophy without verification. Therefore the more ignorant they are
the easier to get them into a religious fold. Religion is so strong and
popular because it makes no demand on the intelligent: It simply
requires belief in guru and his teachings.
It
never strikes believer to doubt whether his inherited belief system is
true. They never use their reason because they start and conclude that
their belief system alone is true, because they never question.
Theological
philosophers say God is a perfect being, but they have never known God,
never proved his existence; hence their ascription of perfection to Him
is purely self-imagined or assumed.
The
scholastic or mystic argument is endless. If one says "God is formless”
another will reply, "No, God has attributes! If one says "his religion
is higher" another will reply, "No, it is lower." It is impossible to
get anywhere with such talk because both sides are merely imagining
because they think on the base of the false self and false experience.
When the self is not physical then whatever seen, known, believed and
experienced as person is bound to be falsehood. Therefore, there is
need to know the fact that, the self is formless.
The
paradise or heavens and hell are mere religious injected imagination.
When the self is formless then the experience of birth, life death and
the universe are mere mirage. But where people have got a little
thinking capacity, they begin to disbelieve through the contradictions
of various contending orthodox claims and descriptions.
For religion one can interpret texts as he likes, in whatever way that pleases him, he simply imagine away.
In pursuit of truth the ultimate truth has to be proved, not assumed. Pundits who take scriptures for granted are not Gnanis.
Pundits
teach that all is your-self, but none of them can show that this is so,
none has analyzed it scientifically, and none can prove it. Rational
proof is needed, so that one arrive at knowing truth i.e. wisdom;
punditry is mere dogma, parrotism, repetition of what they read in
scripture. Scripters are not yardstick and scriptural truth is not
proof. Pundits take scripters as authority. Authoritarianism merely
assumes as true what another says, but what has yet to be proved.
Seeker has to test truth in this world not in the next world. There is no
proof other then blind belief based on the scriptures, belief is not
truth. So, doctrines are not the means to realize the truth. There is
no need to follow them.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.